This collection of essays and resources explores the role of the United States Constitution in perpetuating racism. While many individuals and groups document inadequacies in the Constitution, this section addresses questions like: How does the structure of the government preserve racism? What kind of government structure will support a multicultural nation without racism? How do we use Article V of the Constitution to transform America?

The One Percent Are Planning to Re-Write the Constitution

Map of United States highlighting the 28 states that have called for a Constitutional Convention: Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, New Hampshire, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, West Virginia, Wisconsin, Wyoming
We need a plan to fix the Constitution

We who believe that racism needs to end are working hard to overcome our own biases and working with others to identify both conscious and unconscious biases. Many are also addressing institutional racism in the communities and organizations we relate to. But a very well-funded project is working at odds with our projects and seeking to stop progress on tearing down barriers that non-white people experience, end privileges experienced by whites, and empower all identity groups to have full participation in the cultural, economic, and political life of America.

A Black Guy Wrote a Guide to the Constitution

Elie Mystal with the cover of his book,  “Allow Me to Retort: A Black Guy’s Guide to the Constitution”

Elie Mystal has a wonderful way of making things that lawyers talk about regarding the Constitution sound like common sense. As the legal analyst and justice correspondent for “The Nation,” an MSNBC legal commentator, and the legal editor of the “More Perfect” podcast on the Supreme Court for Radiolab, he argues for the American people to take the country away from the conservatives.

January 6th Congressional Hearings and Democracy

Committee members seated at a raised desk at front of room; Donald Trump photo on large screen above committee members; press photographers in foreground.
In a democracy Trump would not have been elected president

The January 6th hearings in the House of Representatives exposed attempts by Donald Trump to subvert the Constitutional system used to elect presidents. Neither President Trump and his co-conspirators nor the people who ensured the non-violent transfer of power to President Biden were driven by a commitment to democracy. Trump was unsuccessful because people were loyal to the Constitution.

A commitment to the Constitution as it stands with an equal commitment to changing the Constitution when it is not fulfilling the values of democracy is the path to creating a multi-cultural nation that is not based on racism.

What Can I Do About Gun Safety?

 American Tactical OMNI AR15
Responding to mass shootings in May of 2022

The May 2022 random murders of people in Buffalo, New York; Laguna Woods, California; and Uvalde, Texas were stark reminders of the fragility of human life and how precious every child and adult is. My granddaughter went to bed crying. Barack and Michell Obama are angry. I keep asking myself, what can I do? I am still troubled by the question, but I have one idea.

Fixing the Government

Page from the U.S. Constitution showing Articles V, VI, and VII.
How Article V of the Constitution avoids a revolution

The men who wrote the Constitution knew that it is not perfect. So, they provided a way that changes can be made. The process to amend is outlined in Article V. Amending is a political process that is much more difficult than making laws. However, it has provided a path in the past to reorganize structures of the government. Today we have a government based on the idea that white men are superior to others. And we have a tool to fix that. It is Article V of the Constitution.

It’s Time to Amend the Constitution

A commentary in Politico

Sarah Isgur points to the current role of the Supreme Court and the inability of Congress to solve problems. She builds a case for amending Article V of the Constitution. She quotes Justice Scalia who said he "once calculated what percentage of the population could prevent an amendment to the Constitution, and found it was less than 2 percent. ‘It ought to be hard, but not that hard"

Isgur concludes, "He’s right. It’s time to amend the amending process."